Yes, Virginia, Technology Has Changed the Way Students Learn | Higher Ed Gamma – Inside Higher Ed
MOOCs and beyond.
How to engage, motivate and maximize learning, participation and performance among today’s digital natives.
New technologies, we often hear, are rewiring the younger generation’s brains—and not in a good way. Social media receives much of the blame. Perhaps you’ve seen the scare headlines: “Social Media Is Changing Your Brain in 5 Terrifying Ways,” “Teen Mental Health Is Plummeting and Social Media is a Major Contributing Cause,” “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” “The High Price Society Pays for Social Media.” Or how about this: The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future.
According to such widely read commentators as Jonathan Haidt and Jean Twenge, social media:
These are, of course, gross generalizations that require greater nuance and specificity than shock headlines typically provide. That’s not to say that such hyperbolic claims don’t rest on a kernel of truth. Algorithmically curated feeds are indeed designed to engage users and do encourage forms of multitasking that can inhibit sustained concentration.
But broadening the time frame makes it clear that anxiety, depression, self-harm and teen suicide aren’t 21st-century developments. Teenage suicide rates peaked in the late 1980s and early 1990s before plunging around the turn of the century and then rising again after 2005.
Outrage over social media is only the latest example of blaming new technologies for societal ills.
Of course, social media also has positive aspects that critics tend to minimize. Given today’s smaller families and lower birth rates, social media has become indispensable in helping the young find connection, acceptance and positive support.
But let’s step back and revisit issues of greater relevance to college teaching:
In my view, the answer to each of these questions is yes—but not necessarily in the ways than techno-determinists assume. A decade ago, research conducted by the Pew Internet Project and Common Sense Media and journalists’ interviews reported that classroom teachers reported that technology had:
Although no one knows for certain whether intensive exposure to technology has shortened attention spans, fueled narcissism, diminished the ability to recall information or displaced long-form, sustained reading, it does appear that certain characteristics of contemporary digital culture may have had an impact on learning. These include an increase in:
But the issue isn’t simply technological. Today’s undergraduates are far more diverse than their predecessors, not only in their race or ethnicity or class background or age or immigration status, but in their prior knowledge, level of preparation and familiarity and facility with and previous exposure to college reading and workload expectations.
So how should this alter our teaching?
We know how to do this:
Today’s students have distinctive learning and mental health needs and learning and communication styles, and instructors need to alter their pedagogies to accommodate these needs. If we hope to deepen and maximize lasting learning, increase active participation in the learning process and improve performance among the so-called digital natives, our pedagogies need to evolve.
Business as usual won’t cut it.
You may have read a recent piece in Forbes entitled “Holographic Patients to Help Train the Next Generation of Medics,” which describes the use of mixed-reality advanced simulations, VR/AR-powered practice surgical procedures and lifelike holographic scenarios in the training of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel.
It has become increasingly clear that health-care workers can acquire factual knowledge more efficiently than simply from lectures and that for those invested with literal life-and-death responsibilities, exposure to realistic situations in which they need to make real-time decisions and perform in under true-to-life circumstances can greatly improve their preparation.
Health-care education should be a spur and inspiration for those of us in the liberal arts. If more active forms of learning are the future of health-care education, then shouldn’t the rest of us follow suit?
Steven Mintz is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin.
Resources for faculty and staff from our partners at Times Higher Education.