White paper urges governance for AI school grading technologies – Phys.org


Forget Password?
Learn more
share this!
Share
Twit
Share
Email
November 16, 2022
by Sally Quinn,
Automated grading technologies could soon be rolled out in Australian schools but without robust national guidelines and an independent advisory body, some schools could be left behind.

“Machine marking” or “automated essay scoring” (AES) is increasingly used internationally, especially in the United States, in a range of high-stakes testing contexts where results determine student progression and school funding. The technology is highly likely to come to Australian schools in the coming years and could cause controversy without careful governance and consultation with the education community, the says.
The white paper says Automated Essay Scoring (AES) could potentially alleviate aspects of teachers’ workload at a time when teacher attrition is historically high and teacher recruitment historically low. But the technology also generates new demands on teachers and administrators, including financial pressure on schools that must procure these proprietary technology packages without advice.
Professor Kalervo Gulson in the School of Education and Social Work, is a researcher in and advances in . He studies how schools can grapple with and respond to rapid changes in technology in the education sector, which are known as EdTech.
“We know teachers are already experiencing heavy workloads and this new technology could help ease the pressure, so long as the implementation doesn’t create even more work,” said Professor Gulson.
“We don’t recommend automated grading in high stakes testing where the results might impact the student’s future or the school’s funding,” Professor Gulson said. “And like all types of artificial intelligence in schools, it is important that the people impacted by it understand what it will do, and have a say in its introduction.”
Co-author Professor Greg Thompson, from Queensland University of Technology, is a former high school teacher and an expert in education assessments. He reinforced that: “We should continue to be cautious about any technology that relies on opaqueness being used to make consequential decisions in schools. More time and effort is needed to be spent on opening these systems up to improve both scrutiny and understanding.”
NAPLAN and robo-marking
In 2018, the Department of Education, Skills and Employment attempted to implement a form of AES into NAPLAN. However, this “robo-marking” attempt proved politically unpopular and was scrapped by the Minister. The concerns from teachers, teachers’ unions, principals and parents included:
AI in classrooms
The researchers say: The use of artificial intelligence in classrooms can be of great benefit to both teachers and students but it is crucial to have guidelines to safeguard our schools.
“Without in this area, it is ultimately up to and agencies, policymakers, and school communities to work collaboratively to assess the benefits and pitfalls of AES and map the way forward,” said Professor Gulson, who is a researcher in Sydney Social Sciences and Humanities Advanced Research Center (SSSHARC). “Our recommendations will assist the emergence of good governance in this area.”
“Technology like AES can bring benefits but our schools need urgent guidance, as well as making sure all schools have the necessary digital infrastructure and human skills,” said Professor Gulson.
Recommendations:
This white paper was developed by the Education Futures Studio and the Education Innovations research program.

Citation: White paper urges governance for AI school grading technologies (2022, November 16) retrieved 17 November 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-11-white-paper-urges-ai-school.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Provided by University of Sydney
Explore further
Facebook
Twitter
Email
Feedback to editors
36 minutes ago
0
2 hours ago
1
2 hours ago
0
2 hours ago
0
Nov 16, 2022
0
36 minutes ago
56 minutes ago
56 minutes ago
56 minutes ago
56 minutes ago
56 minutes ago
56 minutes ago
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
Oct 20, 2022
Sep 16, 2022
Oct 13, 2022
Mar 03, 2022
Oct 05, 2020
Jun 09, 2022
Nov 15, 2022
Oct 27, 2022
Oct 19, 2022
Oct 13, 2022
Oct 12, 2022
Oct 11, 2022
Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form. For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines).
Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request
Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.
Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.
Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient’s address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.org in any form.

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we’ll never share your details to third parties.
More information Privacy policy
Medical research advances and health news
The latest engineering, electronics and technology advances
The most comprehensive sci-tech news coverage on the web
This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, collect data for ads personalisation and provide content from third parties. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

source

Related Articles