Judge refuses to delay Hamadeh's election case, rejects computer … – Daily Independent
PHOENIX – Lawyers for failed Arizona attorney general candidate Abe Hamadeh will have to prove Friday that miscounts or other errors in counting ballots would have led to his victory.
And they …
Already have an account? Log in to continue.
Current print subscribers can create a free account by clicking here.
Otherwise, click here to subscribe.
To Our Valued Readers –
Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe. The five stories do not include our exclusive content written by our journalists.
For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, digital subscribers will receive unlimited access to YourValley.net, including exclusive content from our newsroom and access to our Daily Independent e-edition.
Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.
Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy. Please click here to subscribe.
Sincerely,
Charlene Bisson, Publisher, Independent Newsmedia
Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.
Click here create a free account for posting comments. Note that free accounts do not include access to premium content on this site.
PHOENIX – Lawyers for failed Arizona attorney general candidate Abe Hamadeh will have to prove Friday that miscounts or other errors in counting ballots would have led to his victory.
And they will not be allowed to use a computer record of all the votes,, a judge ruled on Thursday.
With only 511 votes separating the Republican from winning Democratic candidate Kris Mayes, Hamadeh attorney Timothy La Sota had urged Mohave County Superior Court Judge Lee Jantzen to give him access to the computer-generated tally of votes cast in the race so he could narrow down the ballots he wants to inspect in Pima, Maricopa and Navajo counties.
“We really need the (cast vote record) to kind of make heads or tails of the ballots” La Sota told the judge during a Thursday morning hearing. “It’s part and parcel with that” inspection.
But Jantzen said the law on election contests only allows ballot inspections, not access to the electronic record that vote tabulation machines create, and he denied La Sota’s request.
He also refused to delay Friday’s one-day trial until next week, agreeing with attorneys for Mayes that the tight deadlines in state law for election contests precluded that.
Jantzen also rejected Hamadeh’s request to add additional three-person panels to inspect ballots, agreeing with Mayes attorney Alexis Danneman and lawyers for Maricopa and Navajo county that more inspection teams were not allowed.
But he did say that he believed the law allows him to appoint different inspection teams in each county – with one person each for Mayes, Hamadeh and the court.
He ordered the lawyers to draw up a list of people for those teams by noon so he could immediately appoint them.
“There has to be an inspection of the ballots by the plaintiffs, and I believe that has to be done today,” Jantzen said. “I’m going to do my hearing tomorrow (Friday).”
La Sota said at the end of the hearing that the ballot inspection would now focus almost solely on so-called “undervotes,” ballots where the computer tabulators found no vote in the attorney general race despite votes in other races.
He had said at an earlier hearing that he believed it was possible ballot tabulators missed some of those votes.
Nearly 40,000 ballots among more than 2.5 million cast statewide had a vote for governor but not for the attorney general’s race.
Hamadeh’s election challenge in one of the closest statewide races in Arizona history faces a high bar. State law says that election results are presumed to be accurate, and there has to be evidence proving that mistakes or fraud would have led to a different result.
Jantzen also rejected La Sota’s effort to get a list of provisional ballots rejected by Maricopa County and the names of those voters so he could determine if some of them should have been counted.
About 58% of the county’s nearly 8,000 provisional ballots went uncounted, many for registration issues that Hamadeh’s suit contends are incorrect.
“The list of provisional ballots and the names of those people is not a ballot,” Jantzen said. “That’s not something that has to be disclosed.”
Hamadeh’s lawsuit alleges four basic issues affected the outcome: that some rejected provisional ballots should have been counted, that ballots were inaccurately duplicated after machines were unable to read them, that election boards improperly counted some votes during a review of problem ballots, and that Election Day problems with polling site vote-counting machines at led to some voters being unable to cast a ballot.
An automatic recount is nearly completed, with 14 of 15 counties transmitting the results to the secretary of state. Results were expected to be released at a Thursday court hearing but have been delayed until at least Dec. 29.
The results of the recount in the attorney general’s race has been ordered held until Hamadeh’s election contest concludes.
Results in races for superintendent of public instruction and a Phoenix-area legislative district were ordered delayed at the request of attorneys for Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, who said in a court filing on Tuesday that all counties have yet to deliver their final recount tallies, and they will need to be reviewed before filing with the court.
Hobbs won the race for governor but faces her own election contest from Republican Kari Lake, who lost by more than 17,000 votes.
A two-day trial in that case was set to conclude Thursday, with a Maricopa County judge expected to later rule on whether Lake had proven her allegations that intentional acts by Maricopa County election officials and illegal votes meant Hobbs had actually lost.
Whoever loses in both the Lake-Hobbs case and the one involving Hamadeh and Mayes is expected to immediately appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court.
Time is tight: new state officials are due to be sworn into office on Jan. 2.
Other items that may interest you
Most popular stories in Daily Independent
Read the latest print edition here.
View this issue
Browse other issues
DON’T MISS A BEAT: Simply submit your e-mail address below, click on the opt-in email link and watch your inbox for news from the Daily Independent at YourValley.net. Thank you for reading!
The New York Mets and Carlos Correa’s agent are having discussions over the infielder’s physical days after similar concerns from the San Francisco Giants led to a collapse of their agreement …
Purdy leads 49ers past Commanders 37-20 for 8th straight win
Bengals force late red zone turnover, hold off Pats 22-18
Blue Jays’ newest addition Varsho excited for opportunity
Vikings edge Giants 27-24 on Joseph’s game-ending 61-yard FG
Singletary, Cook lead way as Bills beat Bears for AFC East
YourValley.net
623-972-6101
17220 N Boswell Blvd
Suite 230E
Sun City AZ 85373
Email: azdelivery@iniusa.org